Silicon Valley Computer SHUGART 706 User Manual Page 79

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 108
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 78
SATELLITE
TV
The
international
connection
THE FAR -REACHING COVERAGE
OF GEO-
stationary
satellites has been
well
known, significantly documented,
and somewhat
troublesome to the
regulators of
the world since the
dawn of satellite
communications.
After more than a decade
of active
involvement
in
the business
of
presenting and
delivering
pro-
gramming via satellite,
the pro-
gramming
industry worldwide
is
finally beginning to come
to grips
with the effects
of such
wide
coverage.
In
its most
simplistic
terms, a
satellite transmission
has two
types of coverage;
intended recip-
ients and
non -intended
recip-
ients.
Under
most
national (and
international) regulations, a
satel-
lite signal is considered a
national
or sub -national service.
It is in-
tended to be
received by one or
more receiving locations, each
of
which is known to the
satellite pro-
grammer
/operator in advance of
the transmission being
sent.
Those are the
intended recipients.
Each country
in the world has
its
own
laws
or
rules regulating
re-
ception of those
transmissions, or
there are
no laws
at all.
(We'll get
to
that situation in a
moment.) The
content of those
laws varies widely
and
only the United
States, Great
Britain,
and
a handful of
other
countries
actually
recognize by
law
that at
least some of the trans-
missions on satellite are open
to
use by
non -intended
recipients.
International law
In
cases
where laws
making it
"legal" to
intercept transmissions
not intended
for you
do
not exist,
the attitude
of most
nations is that
it is not legal to do so. In other
FIG.
1
words, reception is illegal
unless
it
has
been made specifically legal
by legislation /law.
However,
remember
that satel-
lite signals
are
virtually
all national
in
nature;
U.S.
satellite
signals are
intended
for
U.S. users, Canadian
satellites are for
Canadian users,
Mexican
satellites
are
for Mexican
users,
and so on. In Europe, only
the French presently
have a na-
tional satellite service and most
of
the European
countries share one
or more common satellites
(Eu-
telsat).
There,
while the satellite
may
be owned,
operated, and
shared by multiple
countries, the
individual
channels or transpon-
ders
are
leased
by and operated by
individual
countries. Therefore,
under
various
national laws in Eu-
rope, it may
be
legal
to receive and
use
one
channel on Eutelsat (that
one that originates in
or
is intend-
ed
for
use
within
the recipient's
country) but not other
channels
on the
same satellite
if
those chan-
nels
carry
programming
originat-
ing
in or intended for
other
countries in Europe.
All of that
is very confusing to
the layman
who
buys
or builds a
satellite- receiving system and
dis-
covers
not
only
his own country's
signals and programs but
those
BOB
COOPER,
JR.,
SATELLITE
-TV
EDITOR
from neighboring
(or
not so neigh-
boring) countries.
The
science of
satellite
transmissions
has
not ma-
tured yet
to
the point
where
it is
possible to
build a satellite
that
covers only
the United
States.
Nor is
it
possible,
or econom-
ical,
to
build a
satellite
for Europe
where one
channel covers
the UK,
another
France, a third
Denmark
and
so on.
The signals spill
outside
of the
intended coverage
area
rou-
tinely;
people
with the appropriate
equipment
can
receive
those
for-
eign
signals, often
with great
ease.
Figure
1
shows
the test
pattern
for
a Caribbean
superstation
that
transmitts
on
Westar 5, transpon-
der
23. Though
that station's
sig-
nals
are
intended
for reception
in
the Caribbean,
the photo
shown
was taken
in the U.S.
With rapidly developing
domes-
tic
markets for their
programs, that
unintended
spillover
was largely
ignored by programmers
for
near-
ly a decade.
As
an
example,
if a
U.S.
satellite programmer
pur-
chases
rental
or "showing
rights"
for a movie,
it pays a
negotiated
fee
based
upon
the size of
its do-
mestic market.
No payment
is
made
for viewers
located outside
of
the U.S., and
in
fact
the pro-
grammer
has no distribution
rights outside
of the U.S.
That
means that
it
can
not collect
user
fees from
Bermuda even
though
there
are unintended
users
there.
What's
more,
legally the program-
mer must prevent
the
movie
from
being
seen by
those who are
lo-
cated outside
the U.S.
Preventing
reception
One
method
of
protecting
themselves
from unintended
Page view 78
1 2 ... 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 ... 107 108

Comments to this Manuals

No comments